Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Haileybury Computer Club

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. —Cleared as filed. 05:09, 27 November 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Haileybury Computer Club

2 year old computer club at a college. No attempt to establish notability. Delete as vanity.--InShaneee 03:51, 21 November 2005 (UTC)

• Merge with Haileybury College, Melbourne with a brief addition to the Extra Curricular section. Capitalistroadster 04:28, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable, possible vanity. --JiFish(^Talk/_Contrib) 12:22, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Australia-related deletions.
• Delete nn university club. Eusebeus 13:03, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: There is a great deal of precedent here for deletion. Several Linux clubs, for example, have had articles for deletion in the past, and all were deleted. The reasoning is that any given iteration of a club is going to be inherently minor. Unless that club does something spectacular (cracks 32-byte encryption or something), it's going to remain of local interest. Geogre 18:14, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Really NN. Agnte 23:32, 21 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. One of the least notable entries I've seen recently. Roisterer 00:40, 22 November 2005 (UTC)
• keep. I agree that I have been ineffective so far at justifying notability. The article is a "work in progress". If this article should be deleted, consider also Computer Club of Western Michigan University which is also listed under computer clubs. The claim for notability is based on its contribution to educational research. It is referenced in educational research papers at http://www.bris.ac.uk/education/research/networks/gern/gdc05.ppt and http://www.gamelearning.edu.au/conference_sep05.htm

www.becta.org.uk/page_documents/industry/ advice/content_developers_bulletin_mar05.pdf So please judge on its merits in education research rather than by comparison to other computer clubs. Thanks to the Wiki community for your peer review process, page author

• Delete as per nom, nn and probable vanity. Sarah Ewart 03:07, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Ambi 04:48, 24 November 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.