Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HackCam

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was keep. —Xezbeth 19:38, Apr 26, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] HackCam

• Seems to be advertising. Delete. Slac speak up! 00:05, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up. ✏ OvenFresh² 01:56, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with the article about the engine if we have it. 131.211.210.15 07:40, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)

• Sorry, forgot to log in. Mgm|^(talk) 07:42, Apr 18, 2005 (UTC)

• Keep. The article may be written as a promotion for the product, but it's factual enough to be useful. Nor is a merge called for -- HackCam is used with Counterstrike, not a feature of it. ---Isaac R 19:01, 18 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep. I asked the creator of HackCam to write something about it in wikipedia to provide further detail to this relatively new tool. Added criticism to make the article a bit more balanced. Dabljuh 06:39, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Delete videogame trivia CDC (talk) 20:58, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
  • I disagree. The article talks about how the software detects cheats. Interesting even to a non-gamer like me. ---Isaac R 21:41, 22 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• keep this please Yuckfoo 00:54, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)
• Keep and clean up. Despite User:Dabljuh's efforts, the article still needs a bit of NPOV-editing, but the article seems to be encyclopedic enough aside from that. Hermione1980 23:19, 23 Apr 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.