Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/HA! HA!
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was snowball delete. Sr13 01:33, 27 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] HA! HA!
Sourced from Fark, Fark and, er... Fark. I removed some spam, not much left. Guy (Help!) 15:09, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- zOMG, this phenomenon received its unbelievable popularity during the weekend of July 15 - July 17, 2005, when some Fark members posted HA! HA! guy photoshops. Delete. Michaelas10 15:36, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. No assertion of importance. Wikidan829 17:33, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No notability, although its referenced its not meeting WP:NN. — The Sunshine Man 19:10, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment - I'm sure if you let this run the five days, someone can find real sources. Although it's notability is unproven, it obviously is notable. If it can't be proven, delete, but I believe it can. WilyD 19:12, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- It's clearly proven, but it's not clearly notable. --Charlene 23:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete I fail to see how it can be "obviously notable." Phony Saint 19:22, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, forgotten farkism, lacks sources. HA! HA!--Dhartung | Talk 19:38, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless good reliable sources can be found. I am somewhat pessimistic that they will be. daveh4h 20:25, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete nn. JJL 21:13, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Is it possible to BJAODN the page? --Whsitchy 22:46, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. Internet memes are rarely notable; who outside of FARK and various forums is discussing this meme? I don't mean propagating it, discussing it? There are reliable, independent third parties such as newspapers and magazines discussing trends such as lolcats and 'all your base'. I don't see this for Ha! Ha!. It's not even funny enough to bother BJAODNing, not solely since it's two years old. --Charlene 23:16, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- Delete, Not notable. --Random Say it here! 23:49, 26 May 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.