Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guyrules

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was Delete Zzyzx11 (Talk) 03:50, 17 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Guyrules

Author vanity about a non-notable book. Who said "this book fills a much needed gap" ? The article comes with a portrait/bio as a companion: Image:Gar in blue.jpg Rl 18:05, 24 May 2005 (UTC)

• Keep Book seems real. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 18:16, May 24, 2005 (UTC)
• Weak keep. The book has an entry in Amazon [1]. But this article, as it stands, is POV and needs some cleanup and wikifying. Sarg 18:17, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Much of the article is copied directly from the poorly written amazon description, making it a copyvio. If someone wants to write a real article on the book Guy Rules : The Unspoken - and Previously Unrecorded - Rules That Govern Men's Social Being they can, but this isn't it, and it's the incorrect title as well. -R. fiend 20:21, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not notable and has copyvio issues. Jacob1207 23:47, 24 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Not notable. Once upon a time, we didn't just accept that the book exists to determine that it was encyclopedic, because the set of existing books is pretty darned large. Not paper, and all that, but not Everything2.com as well. I see no notability for this book, and this is (copyvio) advertising. Geogre 01:55, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, not notable. Megan1967 06:28, 25 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, NN. Radiant_* 08:56, May 25, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable. JamesBurns 10:51, 27 May 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.