Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gurl

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was - deleted - SimonP 02:20, Jun 14, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gurl

At best transwiki to Wiktionary. Eixo 05:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

• Redirect to Girl. --Sn0wflake 07:40, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. POV essay. Phils 10:21, 29 May 2005 (UTC)
• Delete for too many reasons reasons to mention --Doc (?) 14:43, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

Why not simply redirect? Gurl is a common spelling of girl, and is only logical to redirect! --Sn0wflake 16:01, 29 May 2005 (UTC)

• L33tspeak. -- BD2412 ^talk 21:01, 2005 May 29 (UTC)
• Delete. Too lame to be worth a redirect. Haikupoet 00:26, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Girl. JamesBurns 07:21, 2 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete so this won't stay in the history! redirect could always be recreated. Grue 10:22, 3 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• delete and only then redirect and only if you really have to. Mozzerati 19:57, 2005 Jun 4 (UTC)
• Delete This article is pointless and has no real value. Spacedude 02:33, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Girl. Harpalus 05:42, 12 Jun 2005 (UTC) As stated before, pointless article, based on a term not commonly used. Unknown usage, biased POV standpoint, (such as the negative connotations towards modern punk bands, and the statement "Males of all ages should stay away from gurls at all times.". Editing is completely pointless, as that is essentially the entire article. Redirect recommended.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.