Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gunbound Freeboard
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. howcheng {chat} 22:17, 5 January 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Gunbound Freeboard
Suggesting to delete this and merge the information to Gunbound. JHMM13 (T | C) 
19:38, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- One thing to say is Gunboard is real but this freeboard? idont know abstain? --Jingofetts 19:38, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- this is real -_- go check out the site yourself
- i said it was real. but someone thinks it should get voted on. --Jingofetts 19:41, 28 December 2005 (UTC) wish i could help.
- It's not a matter of whether it's real or not. Wikipedia isn't a database for every facet of every website that's notable. If it was, we'd have to have pages on every function of Yahoo, H*R, Mugglenet, etc. If you want to add information about the website in question, you should add the information you have in a neutral point-of-view without personal attacks to the page Gunbound. JHMM13 (T | C) 19:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- I did not see the personal attacks sorry all. --Jingofetts 19:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- "RASTA is known as the most hated n00b in the history of GBFB (Gunbound Freeboard). He did nothing but to flame others with racist remarks, only to be pounded later. He has engaged in many "fights" with the Legend guyfromkorea, in which he (Rasta) has lost in all. He is responsible for imitating the gentle LadyPlayful in order to degrade her name, however his attempt has failed miserably. Ever since then, he has hidden himself forever from the FB community, and forever been marked as the moronic fool." --This existed on the page when you made your edit. I'm not saying you put the material on there, I'm simply pointing out to anyone reading that that information should not be copied to Gunbound. JHMM13 (T | C) 19:53, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- "RASTA is known as the most hated n00b in the history of GBFB (Gunbound Freeboard). He did nothing but to flame others with racist remarks, only to be pounded later. He has engaged in many "fights" with the Legend guyfromkorea, in which he (Rasta) has lost in all. He is responsible for imitating the gentle LadyPlayful in order to degrade her name, however his attempt has failed miserably. Ever since then, he has hidden himself forever from the FB community, and forever been marked as the moronic fool." --This existed on the page when you made your edit. I'm not saying you put the material on there, I'm simply pointing out to anyone reading that that information should not be copied to Gunbound. JHMM13 (T | C)
- I did not see the personal attacks sorry all. --Jingofetts 19:47, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete - terrible bulletin board software, the game is notable, this forum isn't, and the name isn't even accurate. Searching for "Gunbound Freeboard" on Google gets exactly one result. It's not even called this, it's just called the Gunbound discussion board or something and it happens to be running on the Freeboard bulletin board software. --Cyde Weys votetalk 19:44, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Cyde may i say something? If you got one result on google is there enough to make into a article it looks like this person really wants it here. --Jingofetts 19:46, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Too Everyone if you think its vandal work delete it. The Gunbound exists according to you. --Jingofetts 19:54, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- It's not that I think it's vandalism, it's just not notable. Would you expect to see an article on this website in Encyclopedia Britannica? Please see WP:WWIN. --Cyde Weys votetalk 19:57, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Many things exist, but not everything is encyclopedic. Wikipedia is not an indiscriminate collection of information, mostly because Wikipedia is not infinite. JHMM13 (T | C) 19:58, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- You sure would the Britianica is good. It's good to know not vandalism. --Jingofetts 19:59, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure what you mean or to whom you are writing, but I do think the Encyclopædia Britannica is good: it is highly reliable and well-written, although it doesn't have the cutting edge quality of Wikipedia, and sometimes Wikipedia is more in-depth and has more relevant internet-based references. So, as I said, I'm not entirely sure what you mean. JHMM13 (T | C) 20:31, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not entirely sure what you mean or to whom you are writing, but I do think the Encyclopædia Britannica is good: it is highly reliable and well-written, although it doesn't have the cutting edge quality of Wikipedia, and sometimes Wikipedia is more in-depth and has more relevant internet-based references. So, as I said, I'm not entirely sure what you mean. JHMM13 (T | C)
- Delete per nom and Cyde. Just zis Guy, you know? [T]/[C] AfD? 21:17, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, comeon, one Google hit? User:Zoe|(talk) 21:39, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, and merge into GunBound if deemed notable enough for that.--Petros471 21:59, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, no need to merge. Completely non-notable web forum, inaccurate article. --Quarl 02:09, 29 December 2005 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
