Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gun Runners Scenario Paintball Team

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Coredesat 02:00, 21 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gun Runners Scenario Paintball Team

Gun Runners Scenario Paintball Team (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

None notable paintball team. Only 63,000 Ghits. No sources M8v2 03:04, 16 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nomination, mostly unsourced conjecture. --Daniel J. Leivick 03:15, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
    • Comment Also when looking at the people who have edited the page it is a clear Conflict of Interest--M8v2 03:19, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Tentative Delete While there is likely a conflict of interest here, that isn't in and of itself good grounds for deletion. The real problem is the lack of verifiability and possible notability problems. If the information in the article is actually true then it is likely that there are sources out there and if they are provided I'd probably support a keep --The Way 06:43, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete we don't get a lot of paintball team articles so it's tough to say just where precedent lies. However, the article is obviously unsourced and I don't see anything obious in Google News or Google Books to source it with, either. The nominator is being pretty generous when it comes to Google hits. I get no unique hits at all for "Gun Runners Scenario Paintball Team" (in quotes) and only 32 unique hits for "Gun Runners" + "Paintball". Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 14:39, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomOo7565 17:56, 16 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete absent some additional argument for notability (i.e., ranked nationally or something). JCO312 00:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.