Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guitar Hero IV

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 00:18, 10 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Guitar Hero IV

Guitar Hero IV (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

This is absolute bollocks. Nothing has been announced, ridiculously crystal ball. By the same editor who bought us Call of Duty 5. What next? The Passion of the Christ 2: Rapture? Quake 5? - hahnchen 12:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete per nom. Self-described "rumor." --Evb-wiki 12:50, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete as unsourced rumor, possible hoax. Either way, it's WP:CRYSTAL. Ten Pound Hammer • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps•Review?) 13:02, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Strong delete All of the above and it is only one sentence and an infobox (rumorbox?) —Travistalk 13:10, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per above - I'm still waiting for Terrance and Phillip 3 - Revenge of the Stink Will (talk) 13:25, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete An Hero > Guitar Hero IV. --PEAR (talk) 13:36, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Duh-lete. I can't wait to hear about the bids for the 2048 Olympics. Also, how the hell could the game be a "prequel to Guitar Hero"? The games don't have stories- you can't have a prequel to something that has no plot or time period. -- Kicking222 13:37, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • strong delete - no content, WP:CRYSTAL, no verifiability, no external sources. How does this article not get deleted on sight? AllGloryToTheHypnotoad 15:07, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • strong delete -- ditto everybody per Crystal, Rumor, etc. SpikeJones 15:52, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as CRYSTAL BALLS. It's hard to take seriously an article which says "Nothing is known about the game..." Iain99 16:28, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Pretty clear cut case of crystal balling. Spellcast 17:55, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. SilkTork 20:56, 5 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as completely lacking sources, just like a number of other "rumor mill" style articles the author has created today; unfortunate that we need to break out a sledgehammer, like this, but I can't see any easy alternative. To answer the "what next" question, apparently Halo 4. – Luna Santin (talk) 03:36, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nomination this is WP:CRYSTAL ball speculation right now and nothing more. Burntsauce 17:39, 9 August 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.