Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guilford Native American Association

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Now meets the 'multiple independent sources' standard. Yuser31415 05:43, 11 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Guilford Native American Association

Guilford Native American Association (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Local association of no evident wider significance. I am sure it is a worthy endeavour, but it does not seem to haveben the focus of any non-trivial indepednent coverage. Guy (Help!) 19:30, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete - no evidence of notability to satisfy WP:ORG. As nominator says, no evidence of independent coverage; only link is to their own website. Walton monarchist89 19:38, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I would caution against reliance on WP:ORG, which had never reached consensus and which was recently merged into WP:CORP. Whether or not the organization generates a lot of press or garners a lot of media attention ought not be the sole criterion to assess a charitable cause. As a registered non-profit organization, this organization is the oldest of its kind in North Carolina and one of the oldest in the United States.[1] I've added that to the article. The organization certainly seems to have a significant impact despite its size and has major local impact. Agent 86 21:21, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep. I've added several additional refs - mostly from North Carolina state government sites; should meet the 'multiple independent sources' standard now. -- MarcoTolo 05:44, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.