Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guilds and convents

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was DELETE. Golbez 08:16, Jun 18, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Guilds and convents

A personal essay from the same folks who brought you "period eye" Blackcats 09:02, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

• Delete more "period eye" stuff Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:01, Jun 9, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete all this period eye cruft as personal essays. Non-notable, original "research" Wikibofh 14:08, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Original research. Geogre 14:54, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, because I read this and go "what the...?" -- BD2412 ^talk 17:53, 2005 Jun 9 (UTC)
• Strong delete along the lines of everything else this user has done: Original research, POV, bias. jglc | t | c 17:57, 9 Jun 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.