Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Guidestone

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. fuddlemark (fuddle me!) 14:37, 13 December 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Guidestone

not needed - the info is already covered in homeworld, and this doesn't seem to be important enough to warrant its own page. --Bachrach44 02:34, 5 December 2005 (UTC)

• Delete - topic is completely covered in a sentence in homeworld (a video game) . Page is two months old, and hasn't been touched since its creation, so there's no reason to think that article will grow. -Meegs 02:41, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to Homeworld KillerChihuahua 14:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete: Unlink it in Homeworld, too, eh? I have a feeling a lot of proper nouns get links in articles when they're written, and then the authors feel compelled to write self-evident or bizarre things like this to justify those links. The subject is a component of a larger topic, where it is already discussed, so no need for separate treatment or, I think, a redirect. Geogre 18:46, 5 December 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - It's covered by Homeworld.

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.