Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grunka lunkas
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Carlossuarez46 00:23, 28 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Grunka lunkas
Non notable, shown in very few episodes. DurinsBane87 03:25, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Keep Few episodes but notable enough. Some fans (not me) will want information about them. 69.116.62.33 03:37, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
-
- Comment Fans wanting information is not wikipedia's concern. Notability is. These are not notable. being in 1, maybe 2 episodes while being ONLY supporting character does not make a subject notable. DurinsBane87 03:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment See WP:USEFUL and WP:INTERESTING. Dbromage [Talk] 03:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Comment Fans wanting information is not wikipedia's concern. Notability is. These are not notable. being in 1, maybe 2 episodes while being ONLY supporting character does not make a subject notable. DurinsBane87 03:39, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete and Redirect to Fry and the Slurm Factory or Futurama. Granted they appeared in a few episodes of Futurama but the article does not assert notability or cite any sources. WP:NOTINHERITED applies. Dbromage [Talk] 03:41, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - Yes, they were a funny take on Oompa Loompas, but they are only that, a fleeting cult/cultural reference. Speciate 03:46, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per lack of real world notability Corpx 04:08, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete - almost every other edit by the user who created this were out-and-out vandalism. AKRadeckiSpeaketh 05:19, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete No real world importance. 17Drew 06:06, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. I think we need a new speedy criterion for lame crap of this nature. --Agamemnon2 12:48, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- Delete per nominator. Nothing worthy of encyclopedic note here. Burntsauce 18:54, 23 August 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.