Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grosse

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete - Liberatore(T) 18:09, 28 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Grosse

An article for an individual level in Doom 2? Please let's not do that. If someone really sees value in the information in here, merge to an article with a short summary for each one. I'd rather just exterminate it though. Hirudo 19:21, 22 April 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete as per nom. -- Grafikm_fr 19:25, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. No way do Doom levels get their own article. --Deville (Talk) 20:48, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete This survived Speedy and prod? Woah. Delete it now. J.J.Sagnella 21:24, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Serious trim and merge. A lot of this information is superfluous, but the main Doom II article is missing some interesting and notable facts from this one (for instance, the inclusion of Commander Keen, a character from a previous id game). I would, however, agree that this doesn't deserve its own article. Give me at least fifteen minutes to do a proper merge before closing the AfD, and then no objections to delete.Captainktainer 23:02, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
    • Merge complete. Delete when ready; all power to forward phaser banks and all that.Captainktainer 23:14, 22 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom. San Saba 10:25, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. Eusebeus 14:10, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
  • Blast it away with a BFG9000, kind of like the redirect at MAP31: Wolfenstein, for being nowhere near notable enough for its own article. I find value in this information, but that's because I still play Doom daily. ;) The levels already have their own articles at the Doom Wiki, which is more than enough. DomRem | Yeah? 15:22, 23 April 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.