Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groseclose

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was DELETE. — JIP | Talk 18:02, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Groseclose

Apparent hoax, I have been unable to verify any part of the article or even the ritual's existence. I could not find the people listed as references, either. Kjkolb 05:43, September 6, 2005 (UTC)

• Delete. OK, kids, it looks like somebody's pulling our leg. "Groseclose" produces no relevant Google hits, but "Groseclose druid" has exactly one hit, which points to a page listing email correspondents of one Jack Sarfatti, a Usenet physics kook whose WP article was listed in AfD a couple of days ago, and "Doug Groseclose" is the name of one of the correspondents. COINCIDENCE? You be the judge! --MCB 06:18, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete per Kjkolb. – AxSkov (☏) 07:33, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. I doubt it is a conspiracy, MCB. It probably has something to do with the quantum information wormhole matrix. Sdedeo 17:08, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. My suspicion is that it is a smear. There are lots of people named Groseclose, but I couldn't find anything on a supposed druidic ritual... Deirdre 18:00, 6 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete as above --Mecanismo 18:28, 7 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.