Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Groovejob
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result of the debate was delete. Sango123 (e) 18:23, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Groovejob
Neologism/possible hoax. I couldn't get any sex-related Google hits for the term (though there was a whole lot of them for Groovejob.com, a site that apparently gets teenagers (presumably groovy) jobs), and while Google isn't the be-all, end-all source for establishing the existence or relevance of something, when it comes to sexual acts, I'd say it does pretty well. Delete. -- Captain Disdain 03:07, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Also, it's not so much an encyclopedia article as it is a dictionary definition, but since it's about a non-existent topic, that seems kind of irrelevant. -- Captain Disdain 03:09, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Garbage. Delete. --Charles 03:16, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete. Patent nonsense; neologism; original research. Bucketsofg✐ 03:28, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete as per above. wikipediatrix 03:54, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete WP:NEO : Librarianofages 04:04, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per Bucketsofg. DarthVader 14:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per all above. Angus McLellan (Talk) 18:37, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete per nom. SorryGuy 23:19, 2 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Patent nonsense. --
Srikeit(talk ¦ ✉) 01:42, 3 May 2006 (UTC) - Delete per nom. -- ReyBrujo 01:47, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Strong delete unpleasant garbage.ßlηguγΣη | Have your say!!! - review me 02:46, 3 May 2006 (UTC)
- Delete Used several search engines and found nothing. Runcorn 10:56, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
