Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gripweed. : a neat biography

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was speedy delete CSD A7 - author's request. Kimchi.sg 13:57, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gripweed. : a neat biography

Seems like vanity, and is rather short of WP:MUSIC. Minimal ghits. Only question is: they claim they've performed with a few notable acts. Does that evne matter? Seidenstud 08:26, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete as non notable. Couldn't this have been nommed for speedy? TheRingess 08:28, 9 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as they don't meet WP:MUSIC. -- Mikeblas 08:55, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

I don't think is vanity, administrators can do their work, they can delete my contribute anyway,but I think that the band I wrote about could deserve to be here. I don't know why you are so crabby. I think that if you wanted to suggest my article for deletion you should have been much more polite.the last user gave me a much more appreciable reason for deleting my article Kyotosong 09:04, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.