Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grimalkin

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. Mailer Diablo 06:49, 12 May 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Grimalkin

Prodded but i think a redirect may be better. it may even be able to get enough for its own article? BL Lacertae - kiss the lizard 00:49, 7 May 2006 (UTC)

• Keep This is definitely a term which has has entered our culture and consciousness and become more than just a Shakespearean character name. I get 93,800 Google hits. Could be expanded. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 01:01, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep. I'd be tempted to say that just about any figure from MacBeth would be notable. --Allen 04:45, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep I was going to say use as a redirect, but I think there's enough material out there to expand the stub. Tyrenius 09:49, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep and expand, notable term. --Terence Ong 12:05, 7 May 2006 (UTC)
• Keep expand tho. Newyorktimescrossword 01:54, 8 May 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.