Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grihasoft

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete. ♠PMC♠ 16:23, 27 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Grihasoft

Grihasoft (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Spam No sources given to prove notability, does not meet WP:ORG. —Ocatecir ^Talk 06:00, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

• Speedy Delete Spam, fails WP:CORP, in that it is blatant advertising and there are no verifiable third-party references given or, from what I can find, available. I tagged this article with a speedy nomination originally and the author has blanked the template twice now. Rockstar915 06:03, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete no opinion on the notability of the company, but the article as written is blatant spam. Excerpt: "Mission: To deliver superior quality catalog content with quick processing ability at reasonable prices to all our customers...". Ugh. Believe it or not, the article was even worse up until recently, as an anon removed some of the spammiest bits after the article was nominated for AfD. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 12:59, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete and prevent recreation since the editor seems determined to keep this spam alive. StuartDouglas 13:12, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete as spam. Tagged it accordingly. MaxSem 15:18, 26 March 2007 (UTC)
• Speedy delete Spam. Acalamari 18:41, 26 March 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.