Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grey Jedi

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the nomination was delete. Mackensen (talk) 03:01, 10 July 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Grey Jedi

• Delete. Non-notable, non-canon, and largely unreferenced original research, especially as the very first sentence of the article is "The concept of Grey Jedi is completely fanmade." — Mike (talk • contribs) 16:46, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Although we're probably in WP:SNOW territory here. Still, we can try our best... Tevildo 16:56, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Make it one with the Force. I believe "The concept of Grey Jedi is completely fanmade" in the intro neatly summarizes all the problems with this article. - A Man In Bl♟ck (conspire | past ops) 17:18, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Original research by a fan. Kevin_b_er 19:47, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Strong delete per above. — Deckiller 20:32, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Transwiki after merging with all other related to Wikifancruft sister project. Ste4k 20:52, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Non-notable GassyGuy 22:27, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete pure, unrefined fancruft. Danny Lilithborne 23:45, 2 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. I just merged it into Jedi. The Wookieepedian 00:44, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete, no longer needed (it really wasn't ever needed), unreferenced fancruft. --Coredesat talk. o.o;; 01:08, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jedi per Wookieepedian's merger. For GFDL reasons, you can't merge and delete ... if you merge, the old article needs to be kept as a redirect. BigDT 01:14, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Keep for References The way I see it, it is obviously fanmade, but it might be smart to keep it around for future reference so up and coming Star Wars fans realize that there once was an idea of Grey Jedi. It also says at the bottom of the article, and becuase I played the game, in Star Wars Knights of the Old republic 2, there is an euippable item called a Grey Jedi Robe. So it must have something to do with the universe one way or another.
• Delete -- I'm not sure I'd call it fancruft per se, but it's definitely fanon at best. Strictly speaking it's a product of the Expanded Universe, and barely that as it came out of the RPG world. Haikupoet 03:45, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jedi. The concept is actually canon, per Legacy #0, but it doesn't warrant a separate article. -LtNOWIS 06:09, 3 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Star Wars cruft. -- GWO
• Redirect. As others have pointed out, there is a grain of canonicity to the concept, bu it's a small one that could easily fit in the Jedi article. --maru (talk) contribs 13:23, 5 July 2006 (UTC)
• Redirect to Jedi. --Zoz (t) 12:54, 9 July 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.