Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gregory Jenkins
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
{
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete. Keeper | 76 | Disclaimer 01:33, 12 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Gregory Jenkins
Claim to fame is that he worked on a Government manual. If the manual deserved an article, he could be mentioned there, but it doesn't. CitiCat ♫ 02:32, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep. The article has enough references to prove notability of both the manual and its author. This is not just any manual, but part of a deliberate campaign to marginalize dissent. --Eastmain (talk) 02:40, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete It's a WP:COATRACK. Why this isn't in an article about the manual, or in Free speech zones, I don't know, but it's a clear violation of WP:BIO and horribly unencyclopedic to have an article titled Gregory Jenkins that's about one manual he wrote as a small part of his job.--Prosfilaes (talk) 04:05, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete content is non-biographical, subject is non-notable. Jfire (talk) 07:20, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Delete, merits only inclusion in the "author=" field of a reference for the free speech zone article. Unless Wikipedia is about determining who will be first up against the wall when the revolution comes, in which case I think he would still be a ways down the list. --Dhartung | Talk 07:24, 4 February 2008 (UTC)
- Actually, he's already mentioned in free speech zone, as apparently a couple who were arrested are suing him. Not enough to make him notable, but it's something more than what's in the article.--Prosfilaes (talk) 03:49, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- I have removed the irrelevant material to this article. Unless further significance can be shown, Redirect to free speech zone. Sethie (talk) 03:53, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- Keep Just because we have had only a tiny bit of information on this person is not a reason to delete. Thanks to the "Wisdom Of Crowds", others familiar with him can add more details, the fundamental effect of a wiki. His influence and power have affected free speech in America significantly, so his notability is enduring, though his fame not great. His official White House bio specifies he used to be a FOX NEWS producer! This is additional evidence of unhealthy ties between the W administration and the press that covers him. http://www.whitehouse.gov/results/leadership/bio_510.html Ace Frahm (talk) 04:14, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
