Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greg Stuart

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was to Delete the article. --Konst.ableTalk 11:22, 3 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Greg Stuart

Vanity, borderline spam. Prod tag removed by article creator. cholmes75 (chit chat) 19:31, 22 October 2006 (UTC)

  • Delete Fails WP:COI, also not notable QuiteUnusual 21:39, 22 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Comment the use of the word "vanity" in such cases is now strongly discouraged! Please see WP:COI. Also, conflict of interest alone is not enough to qualify for deletion. That said ... Xtifr tälk 07:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
    Response - Duly noted, much thanks for the heads up. --cholmes75 (chit chat) 13:24, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete ... no evidence whatsoever of sufficient notability, reads like an ad, might even be speedyable under G11. Xtifr tälk 07:56, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete per Xtifr --Marriedtofilm 04:31, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Rewrite. The subject appears notable per WP:BIO. His book ranks 1,654th on Amazon.com, and has received multiple reviews. Ohconfucius 05:33, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
"Rewrite" is not a argument, "rewrite" is an instruction. If you think it can be rewritten to meet WP standards and not be blatant spam, please feel free. And do it quick! Blatant spam should be deleted on sight. A NPOV article can be created at any later date. And I, personally, couldn't be bothered. Xtifr tälk 10:23, 26 October 2006 (UTC)
  • Delete. Being the president of an organization that doesn't have an article about it on Wikipedia is not enough to convey notability under WP:BIO. --Metropolitan90 07:30, 3 November 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.