Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greenfuel

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was merge in non-advert material (of which there was little) into biofuel. -R. fiend 18:10, 29 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Greenfuel

With the exception of a single edit adding a logo, this article has only been edited by anons from "Cambridge Incubator, Inc.", a company with the same address as GreenFuel itself. There is no indication that this company is particularly prominent in its field. —Brent Dax 19:10, 19 September 2005 (UTC)

• Merge: While I never heard of Cambridge Incubator or the GreenFuel brand, the article mentioned some technology that's worth mention in either Biofuel, Biodiesel, or any similar articles that I forgot to mention. It's also possible to keep the article and rename it to something more generic, but I feel more comfortable with the merging idea. -Solarusdude 19:29, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Rewrite for NPOV under a different name - the article is clearly an ad, but the technology seems to have notability. Either that or merge as a subsection of Biofuel as per Solarusdude. - --Outlander 20:39, 19 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge. ··gracefool |☺ 18:10, 25 September 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.