Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green to Gold

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. -- RG2 01:49, 31 October 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Green to Gold

Green to Gold (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

I can't see why this book needs a WP article. NN as far as I can see and none asserted in the article. If anyone knows differently... Pigman 23:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 11:35, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete as blatant advertising, per CSD#G11. —gorgan_almighty 13:01, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep I think that [1] and [2] establishes notability — Ksero 14:18, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep - Ksero's links just about scrape by WP:BK, but it's weak. Guinness 15:39, 22 October 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.