Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Goblin's Last Stand

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Naconkantari 04:35, 7 October 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Green Goblin's Last Stand

Non-notable fan film. Delete as vanity. --InShaneee 02:01, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

• Comment—just wanted to point out that the usual internet notability tests may be misleading for this, because it was produced and first distributed in 1992. Postdlf 02:30, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as possible copyvio from here and a fork of The Green Goblin's Last Stand. No comment as to notability. I heard about it years ago, though. --HKMarksTALKCONTRIBS 02:32, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
  • I added the AFD notice to The Green Goblin's Last Stand as well; the nom above had nothing to do with whether this was a fork or a copyvio. Postdlf 02:56, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
    • It really should be listed separately... --HKMarksTALKCONTRIBS 02:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
      • Why? It's the same content. --InShaneee 14:36, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
        • Same subject, different content, and the *The GGLS* article doesn't have copyvio issues. --HKMarksTALKCONTRIBS 00:21, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
          • The AFD nom was based on the subject, not the specific content, notwithstanding how you voted. Copyvios are not handled through AFD. Postdlf 04:38, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
            • In that case, Keep - It's a bit light on sources but can be improved. --HKMarksTALKCONTRIBS 05:10, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It's poorly written, but I suppose that's not an AFD issue. We keep far kruftier stuff than this. A 1992 film doesn't strike me as likely to be vanity. Tag it for copyvio though. Derex 06:58, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Weak keep I deleted the whole "plot summary" as it was clearly a copyvio (good catch, HelenKMarks), but it looks like this has been around a while and has probably generated significant interest to merit an article. --Hyperbole 16:44, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
• Keep It's a notable fan-film, with a separately released documentary on it, and if Stan Lee really commented on it, that'd push it over the top. FrozenPurpleCube 17:43, 2 October 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.