Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Green Day (Lambton High School)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was obviously delete. It's already in the main high school article anyway, and is borderline speedyable.--Wizardman 00:44, 22 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Green Day (Lambton High School)

Green Day (Lambton High School) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Annual event at a particualr high school. Seems pretty clearly non-notable, and no sources cited to counter this impression. Tagged for speedy, but A7 does not apply to events nor, it is generally heald, to school articles. DES (talk) 22:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC)

  • Delete as per my nom, unless independant reliable sources are cited to clearly establish notability. DES (talk) 22:53, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as non-notable. --Finngall talk 22:59, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • While I am a proponent of expanding the CSD A7 criteria, I guess I will have to go with Snowball delete for now as I can't see any WP:RS covering this. Leuko 23:14, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy delete Whether it technically fits the A7 criterion or not, this is something that so clearly does not belong on Wikipedia that there's no point in letting it sit around a full five days. Call it a G11 speedy if we need to. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:28, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per nomination. Does not comply with WP:NOTE NSR77 T 23:29, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. -- :) Chetblong 23:33, 20 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Speedy Delete per WP:SNOW and a WP:IAR view of CSD-A7. This event fails to assert any kind of notabiilty, thus it fails the spirit of A7 completely, even if the criteria does not explicitly include events. Resolute 04:18, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
    • I would argue that there is no "spirit of A7" or more exactly the consensu discussions that created and later expanded A7 all included strong feeling that the reach of A7 must be narrowly limited and that anything outside of the explicitly defiend limits should not be speedied because there is too much chance that more eyes wil make a difference. DES (talk) 13:47, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- John Vandenberg 08:42, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - The school already has its own article and this event does not show notability or verification for its own article in addition. Camaron1 | Chris 10:41, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete - As Chris notes, the same (unreferenced) language is already in the article for Lambton High School. Noroton 18:15, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Article fragment that is already in the school's article, where it belongs. Alansohn 19:01, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.