The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. W.marsh 01:44, 6 October 2006 (UTC)
One big violation of WP:BLP. DRK 23:57, 28 September 2006 (UTC)
Weak keep. It was indeed unreferenced, but I added a few links, so somebody could work them into the article. This was a notable scandal and not entirely resolved by the time of Sharon's stroke. --Dhartung | Talk 07:08, 29 September 2006 (UTC)
Keep. As it reads now, it is not violation of WP:BLP as it just states that it was a scandal, with references to the scandal. Themindset 19:51, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
Keep I think it's been salvaged. JASpencer 20:33, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.