Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greatest Planet

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedily deleted as G11, non admin closure. Cenarium (talk) 23:11, 8 June 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Greatest Planet

Greatest Planet (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

There are many, many organisations operating in this field and this appears to have no specific notability. Requests to expand on its notability have been ignored. The original article appears to have been originally used as link spam Ephebi (talk) 09:38, 6 June 2008 (UTC)

  • Delete - Seems to be an advert with no claims of notability/ reliable sources. TN‑X-Man 17:37, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete — no evidence of notability and no sources. macytalk 18:14, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
  • speedy delete obvious reasons William M. Connolley (talk) 20:49, 6 June 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. ~DoubleAW[c] 00:56, 7 June 2008 (UTC)
  • delete i've found next to no references to the organization via Google. The site seems reasonably professional which seems strange in combination with the lack of links. Either the organization is extremely new - or its a scam (afaict). (or i'm bad at googling ;) --Kim D. Petersen (talk) 16:45, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
  • I can find nothing to support the link to Petra Kelly. The site itself appears to be nearly content free, apart from its shopping cart. I think this is most likely advertising for a new organisation / scam. On that basis, and the votes above, I'm speedying it William M. Connolley (talk) 18:10, 8 June 2008 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.