Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greatest Hits (Lost)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. The others (no pun intended) were soundly deleted, and this one is even farther out than those. I can't find that this has been confirmed by the network yet, and so basically any source is original research by derivation until that occurs. (I did note an entry on the IMDb, but it contained nothing. If I've missed some announcement, then I'd suggest that someone visit WP:DRV with a link to it). I recognise I'm effectively overruling the swing of the debate, but a consistent outcome seems far more sensible to me. -Splash - tk 16:28, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Greatest Hits (Lost)

Greatest_Hits_(Lost) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

--Delete: Wikipedia is not a crystal ball...and spoilerfix.com is not a reliable source.Depressed Marvin 19:40, 1 April 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:22, 2 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete Spoilerfix is a reliable source, however, Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. --thedemonhog talk contributions 00:17, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, along with The Brig and The Man Behind the Curtain. This article is also poorly written and I don't feel like rewriting it when it's just getting deleted anyway. ShadowUltra 21:04, 3 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep - Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - but deleting this article only for it to be remade in around a month seems a little pointless. I think Wikipedia is not a bureaucracy should win the day here. -Halo 13:47, 4 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as per Halo. SenorKristobbal 17:07, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
  • ""Keep"" as per Halo as well, its pointless isnt it?... --Demosthenesdown 20:45, 5 April 2007 (UTC)
    • There is no confirmation by ABC. You reasons for as keeping the article are as worthless as the article. Depressed Marvin 02:02, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep per Halo Mahahahaneapneap 09:04, 6 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.