Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greatest Hits (50 Cent album)

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 10:31, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Greatest Hits (50 Cent album)

Greatest Hits (50 Cent album) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)
  • Pure speculation about a 2008 album that is two ahead of the current release. No sources. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball. NPswimdude500 (Talk|Contribs) 02:14, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • keep it is an album because he said it was in that interviewTru Soulja 02:17, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - Although I did most of the editing so far for that article, I would not oppose it being deleted, it can easily be created again later. If you want proof, see here. Last questions he talks about it, but once again this is not to convince you to keep it, it is just some proof. --- Efil4tselaer 02:24, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. No prejudice to recreation - once the album's release information becomes a bit more concrete than a single interview. --Dennis The Tiger (Rawr and stuff) 02:32, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as crystal ballism. Very little can be certain at this point, including the year and whether it even gets made CitiCat 04:07, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for now as crystally. When it gets closer to release or there are any real details, it can be recreated. What is the hurry to have the article now. It's not like we have a deadline to meet. --Cyrus Andiron 15:46, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete until it's more than crystal ball speculation. Goodnightmush Talk 19:49, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete for now, and recreate when more reliable information is available. -FisherQueen (Talk) 21:02, 12 April 2007 (UTC)
  • Comment - Why hasn't this article been deleted yet? --- Efil4tselaer 14:25, 15 April 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.