Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Greased Lightning (product)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete.  (aeropagitica)  (talk)  20:18, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Greased Lightning (product)

Advertising for something that might be a fuel additive or the like. No evidence of notability in the article. ➨ ЯEDVERS 22:30, 29 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Advertising, it's not a brand I regognise (sic). There's already an article on PTFE which covers its properties. Yomangani 23:51, 29 July 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Advert. Acyso 06:39, 30 July 2006 (UTC)

Do not delete. Greased lightning is a pioneering product which is unlike other products on the markert. I feel i have written it in such a tone that it does not present itself as advertising. If you disagree maybe you could improve it not delete it. ➨ Darren

Have added a second side to the story to dismiss any claims of it being advertising ➨ Darren

Just because a story has both sides doesn't mean it's not advertising. In any case, it doesn't appear that the product is notable enough to warrant a WP entry. Acyso 03:18, 31 July 2006 (UTC)

• Delete for sure. Not notable. --Cassavau 23:22, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete --Peta 09:12, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.