Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gravé dans la roche

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Speedy keep--Kungfu Adam ^(talk) 03:24, 30 April 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gravé dans la roche

Prodded by Urthogie as Group might be notable, but album isn't. Also, please note that the claim that its been criticized by the French government is uncited. Prod removed by Kappa, so bringing it to AfD. Relevant points could be merged to Sniper Eusebeus 12:38, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

• Keep. 300,000 copies of this album were sold [1] and one song was discussed by the minister of the interior in the national assembly [2]. That's notable enough for me. David Sneek 13:04, 24 April 2006 (UTC)
• Clean up article and include facts about notability, as the article currently does not assert its notability. If the artist is indeed notable (which I cannot find evidence of on AllMusic), this may merit an article of its own, but Kappa's constant removal of prod tags without explanation or addressing any of the underlying problems in the article has got to stop. Kuzaar 13:29, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

What is there to clean up? Also, you don't need to give an explanation when removing a prod tag. David Sneek 14:19, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

You don't need to, but I consider it to be part of etiquette that when you say "I contest this deletion", that as part of that you explain why you think the article has merit. And when I said clean up, I should have more properly said Insert more content, because the article itself is a little sparse as it stands. Kuzaar 14:42, 24 April 2006 (UTC)

• Speedy Keep, bad faith nomination. Eusebeus is systematically bringing disputed prods to AfD without regard to merits of dispute. Monicasdude 14:07, 25 April 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.