Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grant Fraser

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was delete. Joyous 23:15, Mar 24, 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Grant Fraser

Not notable. Delete.-gadfium 06:31, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)

• Delete vanity. DaveTheRed 07:37, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, Canadian Green political spam. Someone should probably have a Little Word with them - David Gerard 13:19, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Not likely to be elected, less than 5% in the federal election. Average Earthman 13:58, 13 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete campaign statement, on understanding that if he should actually win election to the BC Legislature, then a new NPOV article can be written. Bearcat 00:34, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• As per my comments elsewhere -- if someone creates a list page for BC Green candidates, Fraser's personal information could be salvaged for a mini-bio (and Fraser's own page could be re-created as a redirect, under these conditions). For the time being, though, delete. CJCurrie 00:42, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete --Spinboy 00:45, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Failed candidates for individual seats in the House of Commons aren't notable, particularly when they garner less than 5% of the vote. Incidentally, the current article is just a copy-paste from the candidate's online bio sketch here [1]. Come back when he's leader of the party or he's won a seat. --TenOfAllTrades | Talk 00:48, 14 Mar 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.