Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grange Road

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. --Bongwarrior (talk) 00:18, 7 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Grange Road

Grange Road (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

No apparent notability on its on - merge MIGHT be in order, but I submit that a AfD is in order. Wisdom89 (talk) 01:14, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete certainly seems nn to me--no assertion of WP:N. JJL (talk) 02:35, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:NOT#DIRECTORY and WP:NOR#OR. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 06:13, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not a trave; guide. -- RHaworth (Talk | contribs) 09:34, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete. Do the people who write these articles not understand that providing no context to the reader is a surefire way of making it an attractive target for deletion? Aside from that, it fails multiple policies such as WP:NOR, WP:V, WP:NOT, and so on.--h i s ^{s p a c e} _{r e s e a r c h} 15:24, 1 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete appears to be an article about buses - doesnt say what Grange Road is or where in the world, but it still does not meet the guidelines as noted above. MilborneOne (talk) 19:03, 1 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete Appears to be NN; Google reveals nothing compelling. Violates WP:N. — Wenli ^{(reply here)} 03:13, 2 February 2008 (UTC)
• Delete NN list. Paste (talk) 21:32, 5 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.