Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grand Prive

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. —Quarl (talk) 2007-02-16 02:41Z

[edit] Grand Prive

Grand Prive (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Spam article. Created (http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Grand_Prive&oldid=70971294) for spam purposes. Created by http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/209.212.105.164 and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Webnetservices Both users (the same person) have only edited this page and have put in such nefarious spam as editing the link to the casino group to read "Online Casino Group Official Site", and inserting other spam. The IP reverses to South Africa, home of Grand Privé group.

There are about 90 microgaming casinos owned by dozens of companies (casino list here: http://www.microgaming.com/pjncasino.php). All the 90 casinos are almost identical apart from colour schemes and different websites. There is therefore no cause to comment on any one particular group unless special notability can be established - this article says *NOTHING* that isn't true of other microgaming casinos, and is therefore a redundant article. This company is privately held, non-notable, nothing useful to say other than act as SEO-bait for this company.

Nssdfdsfds 22:20, 6 February 2007 (UTC)

  • This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 13:09, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Quarl (talk) 00:32, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as spam. Nothing more notable about this apparently. --Dennisthe2 01:24, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete. Lacking independent secondary sources- every potential source just loops back to the company. --Wafulz 04:07, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as above, and, again, as spam. Alex43223 Talk | Contribs | E-mail | C 04:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. JPG-GR 07:12, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete: we don't allow advertisements.--Aervanath 14:25, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete not relevant.TellyaddictEditor review! 16:10, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as spam, consider speedy. MastCell 20:59, 12 February 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete as spam and as lacking independent sources. ElinorD 13:02, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.