Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Graham Middle School

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.--Wizardman 04:27, 8 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Graham Middle School

Reads like a brochure. If this were about a company I'd tag it for speedy-delete with db-sapm. No indication thsat this Middle school is in any way significantly different from the tens of thousands of other such schools. Non-notable DES ^(talk) 01:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)

• Delete as per my nom. DES ^(talk) 01:02, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete, no notability asserted, plus it looks like a sixth grader wrote it. Schools are tricky AfD candidates... Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(((Broken clamshells • Otter chirps)))} 01:17, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - Not really notable according to WP:SCHOOL. --Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr 01:52, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete unless the article gets improved significantly--JForget 01:54, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete as per nom -- Mattl2001 talk | contribs 02:27, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete - per Tλε Rαnδоm Eδιτоr —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lipsticked Pig (talk • contribs)
• Delete per nom. Maxamegalon2000 05:42, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete — Non-notable school. *Cremepuff222* "As cool as grapes..." 18:09, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
• Merge/redirect to Mountain View-Whisman School District. The school article provides no evidence of notability, and a search of Google and Google News/Archive turns up nothing worthwhile at this point. As usual, no legitimate reason has been provided to delete the article, rather than redirect. Alansohn 19:08, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
  • What positive reason is thre to keep, particularly with the chance that someone will try to revert or reexpand? DES ^(talk) 23:53, 3 June 2007 (UTC)
    • First of all, and most obviously, someone may actually be looking for Graham Middle School and can be redirected to the article. Second of all, there is the possibility, especially for a middle school, that at some point in the future there Just might be sufficient sources to establish notability. No one has yet offered any valid explanation to explain why a redirect should NOT be the result. Alansohn 01:29, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• redirect to school district page since people will search for this here yuckfoo 01:41, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per WP:LOCAL.  ALKIVAR™ ☢ 04:09, 4 June 2007 (UTC)
• Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletions. -- Butseriouslyfolks 05:11, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per WP:N and WP:V as notability is not asserted and there are no sources. --Butseriouslyfolks 05:13, 6 June 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect to appropriate locality per WP:LOCAL guidelines and, well, common sense. RFerreira 05:29, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per WP:LOCAL. bbx 13:52, 7 June 2007 (UTC)
• Redirect per WP:LOCAL. --Myles Long 19:23, 7 June 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.