Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gospel Go-Go

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was DELETE. JIP | Talk 15:27, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gospel Go-Go

The page has very little information and hasn't been cleaned up, has a list of bands with no idea of their notability, and the list isn't even clearly defined - what do those categories even mean? It seems that people are adding their own bands as advertising, and that's all this page is for. Awiseman 19:41, 1 August 2006 (UTC)

• Rewrite It's in pretty bad shape right now, but I don't see any reason to outright delete the page. With some work, it can be a worthwhile entry. fuzzy510 07:26, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment I've been trying to get people to come by, both at the main go-go page and at the Washington, DC page, but to no avail. I don't think there will ever be enough to make the page useful, which is part of the reason why I AFD'd it. I don't think it will ever be more than a stub. --Awiseman 21:27, 2 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as unverifiable. Requests to clean up the article have gone unanswered, and it does not even contain a single reference. At best, it is a non-notable neologism, which still needs to be deleted. --Aguerriero (talk) 16:01, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Comment someone just added it to the musical genres project, which I didn't know existed. That might help someone come by and fix it? --Awiseman 18:20, 4 August 2006 (UTC)
• Delete Agree w/ Aguerriero & Awiseman. Good call.--ThatBajoranGuy 06:49, 7 August 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.