Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gorilla mask

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Delete. Rx StrangeLove 17:06, 23 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Gorilla mask

WP:NOT DELETE--MONGO 07:57, 13 September 2005 (UTC)

• Totally deletable advertisement masquerading (no pun intended) as a likely deletable neologism. Let's take the average of totally deletable and likely deletable and simply delete. Grutness...wha? 08:36, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Lock up your daughters, call the police, and delete. TheMadBaron 10:01, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Eeeehrm... delete... and I wish this could be speedied as pn... Anyone dare follow the link to check if it could be classed as an assault page? Usrnme h8er 11:38, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Assuming good faith (sort of laughable) this is a joke page. If not, call the FBI. --Noitall 13:57, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete immediately. Hoax bordering on nonsense. -- BD2412 ^talk 16:53, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete There are some sick puppies out there and the page the link goes to proves it. The site states "All original material, ideas, and concepts © GorillaMask Media, LLC 2003-2005" I won't argue, let them keep them. Alf ^melmac 17:41, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Useless content. Delete, candidate for speedy deletion as patent nonsense and vandalism. - Mike Rosoft 18:02, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete. Yuck. Andrew pmk | Talk 23:11, 13 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete - is there an R-rated version of BJOADN? --Bletch 00:19, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, patent nonsense, advertisement. --DocSigma 16:54, 14 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, save this for wiki parodies, this site should be kept for only serious entries. --Colonel 22:20, 16 September 2005 (UTC) Vote actually by 12.223.171.59 (talk · contribs)
• Delete - complete and utter tripe. Until someone can document even one time someone has ever done this, it is merely cheap advertising for a website. As if someone really runs around with a beard trimmer waiting to have sex and perform this on an unconscious woman. As nobody else seems to have ever heard of this, it is hardly a "phenomenon" and therefore certainly doesn't deserve and article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 70.60.149.226 (talk • contribs) 02:48, 17 September 2005
• Don't delete! This definition is totally awesome! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 128.227.23.116 (talk • contribs) 05:39, 17 September 2005
• Get a sense of humor people. Come on, don't delete. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 65.25.181.61 (talk • contribs) 06:09, 17 September 2005
• i say keep it. i heard of this years ago and believe the webpage was named after the practice, not the other way around. i viewed the page and i would assume it receives it's viewers from word of mouth advertising and links from similar pages- not from 'advertising' on wikipedia, which would seem to be an inefficient way to attract viewers. also, i think it could only be classified as advertising in the most broad sense of the term because it's not a pay site and they aren't selling anything. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 69.175.163.55 (talk • contribs) 10:45, 17 September 2005

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.