Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gopinath

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep. Cbrown1023 01:35, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gopinath

Gopinath (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Originally nominated for speedy but this was declined upon him being a 'saint'. In my opinion I don't even think he is a saint. Google has very few hits. The article is also very poorly written with little use to wikipedia and would need a very large rewrite in order to be acceptable RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or lets have banter 16:44, 8 January 2007 (UTC)

  • Weak keep - It's claimed that he's a Hindu saint. I don't know enough about Hinduism to evaluate the claim, but I can't rule it out. GSearch on his alternative title Bhagwaanji gives more results. Article badly needs rewrite, though. -- Bpmullins | Talk 19:35, 8 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletions. --   ⇒ bsnowball  10:01, 9 January 2007 (UTC)
  • weak keep It is, though just barely, adequately sourced--and Google may be good for many things, but Saints are not among them. DGG 02:12, 11 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Delete, not a saint, not sure what the point of the article is. Slac speak up! 04:34, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep, a stub that needs a good clean by someone who knows the subject area, but sourced and referenced. Nuttah68 13:25, 13 January 2007 (UTC)
  • Weak Keep — Add an expert tag on it, it's sourced and just needs to be fixed up. If it's found on a rewrite hes not a saint of anything, then I'll change my vote on the next one, but until then, appears to just barely pass WP:BIO as it stands. Wizardman 17:28, 15 January 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.