Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Googlewhackblatt

This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record.
The result of the debate was REDIRECT. dbenbenn | talk 16:49, 23 Feb 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Googlewhackblatt

Neologism, I think. RickK 22:32, Feb 11, 2005 (UTC)

• Abstain. This neologism only returns 39 hits on Google but I have the feeling this will substantially increase over time. —RaD Man (talk) 23:11, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect to googlewhack? CDC (talk) 23:21, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Googlewhack. Megan1967 23:47, 11 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and redirect to Googlewhack. Dpbsmith (talk) 02:07, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect, no further merge required as it is already described in the Googlewhack article. Average Earthman 02:21, 12 Feb 2005 (UTC)
• Redirect, per Average Earthman. RJFJR 04:11, Feb 12, 2005 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion, or the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.