Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Google Talk (game)

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete, nem con.. Guy (Help!) 13:29, 10 December 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Google Talk (game)

Google Talk (game) (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

Completely non-notable "word game". Was deleted as an uncotested prod, and that deletion was later contested. WP:NOT for things you made up on the playground one day. AmiDaniel (talk) 05:34, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

• Delete Is there a "Wikipedia is not for strange things you can do with Google" rule? If not, then I need to get cracking on the fun "Extreme Googling" game I came up with. - Richfife 05:47, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - WP:NFT. MER-C 06:04, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. WP:NN and WP:NFT. tgies 06:06, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Wikipedia is not the place to promote the crap you and your buddies made up --Jayron32 06:27, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per all. meshach 06:52, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Just another algorithm. Fails the basic definition of a game. Because "Key components of games are goals, rules, challenge, and interactivity." (the article fails to mention it needs players too). This aims to be funny. There's no way you can "win". - Mgm|^(talk) 11:46, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete No credible sources, no credible claim to notability. Guy (Help!) 14:24, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - quick, please! Snalwibma 14:48, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete as textbook WP:NFT.-- danntm ^T _C 16:11, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete per nom. ← ANAS ^Talk? 16:50, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Sharkface217 05:12, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete - if some historians sit down 100 years from now, and read this article, they will totally get the wrong opinion. The fact is, this game just isn't notable. -Patstuart^talk|edits 14:22, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete no demonstration that this is at all widespread enough, comes across as Yet Another Clever Google Hack. --wwwwolf (barks/growls) 15:53, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Delete per nomination Noclip 21:24, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
• Speedy delete per nom. FirefoxMan 22:26, 8 December 2006 (UTC)
• Comment - somebody snowball this thing. -Patstuart^talk|edits 06:23, 9 December 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.