Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goods and services

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was keep. howcheng {chat} 18:29, 3 January 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Goods and services

This page can't ever have any content that wouldn't end up in either good (economics) or service. Recommend changing it to a redirect and replacing links to goods and services with goods and services Scott Ritchie 17:58, 15 December 2005 (UTC)

  • Relisting due to insufficient votes. - Mailer Diablo 09:54, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as dictef stubstub Jamie (talk/contribs) 10:25, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete as per nom --Darrylv 15:50, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • keep, we need something here. Redirecting to good (economics) is inappropriate because that article is about "goods" vs "bad"s. Kappa 17:33, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Delete per nom. ComputerJoe 21:38, 23 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep Its a commonly used economic term. 30 million google hits for "goods and services" [1] -- Astrokey44|talk 00:40, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep While I agree this term isn't likely to evolve beyond a dictionary stub and would support a transwiki to Wikitionary, the sad reality is that Wikitionary doesn't have much traffic. Can we leave a redirect in Wikipedia to Wikitionary?
    —Preceding unsigned comment added by Samw (talk • contribs)
    • We don't do redirects, but there is a {{wi}} tag. Wiktionary would reject the stuff about GNP, tax etc as "encylopedic" so most of the information would be lost. Kappa 08:36, 24 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and use the {{wi}} tag. Stifle 13:44, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep and expand. -- JJay 20:07, 26 December 2005 (UTC)
  • Keep or redirect. -Tim Rhymeless (Er...let's shimmy) 12:56, 28 December 2005 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.