Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Good Times Magazine (music)
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was Delete -- Chrislk02 (Chris Kreider) 15:01, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Good Times Magazine (music)
Not a notable publication. Aaronproot
-
- This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 18:13, 27 January 2007 (UTC)
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, Agent 86 04:18, 2 February 2007 (UTC) - Weak delete. Article mentions several points of notability (oldest of its kind, notable in its geo/genre, etc). But the only references listed are the mag's own websites. It's hard to google this kind of thing, since the title is a common English expression...probably need someone who knows something about the industry or the mag to find any shred of third-party information. Any such ref would put me at a clear "keep". DMacks 07:05, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete. In its current state, this is a clear delete. Spurious claims to notability backed up by exactly zero references. I would consider changing my vote if the article improved by the end of the AfD. A Train take the 19:56, 2 February 2007 (UTC)
- Keep. Lack of references is a reason to add references. A Google search for ``"good times magazine" +music'' brings us external references here and here and here from just the first couple of pages at Google, to address the issue of notability. Note that these links are not references about this magazine, but their existence speaks to the respect the magazine has within its own industry. One rarely sees articles written about news magazines. I'll poke a friend of mine in the music industry and see if more details can be scrounged. Please feel free to do your own research, too. ◉ ghoti 07:39, 6 February 2007 (UTC)
-
- Surely you jest. Have you actually looked at those links that you pulled out? Even if those weren't just obscure fan sites and commercial sites, your reasoning is flawed. Remember that the criterion for notability states: a topic is notable if it has been the subject of multiple, non-trivial, reliable published works. "Good Times Magazine" is not the subject of any of the links you pulled out. An encyclopedia is a tertiary source, and It is not incumbent upon me, the AfD voter, to do extensive research to save a dubious article; I've got my own research to do. A Train take the 16:25, 7 February 2007 (UTC)
- Delete unless sourced... Addhoc 10:45, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
