Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golem Relictus

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy delete per A7 criteria. Master of Puppets _{Call me MoP!☺} 05:40, 11 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Golem Relictus

Golem Relictus (discussion|history|protect|delete|undelete|logs|links) – (View log)

Article on an unreleased video game that fails to assert notability per WP:N and sources only to website. The article's creator evidently has a substantial conflict of interest, given that the username corresponds to that one of the two game designers. Lacking substantiation of real world notability through reliable secondary sourcing, this article does not meet the guidelines at WP:N. I had originally tagged this for WP:PROD, but prior CSD was contested by creator. Moonriddengirl ^(talk) 13:15, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

I am also nominating the following related pages because it explores a fictional concept related to the above and to another unreleased game:

Vendensetsu (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs)

add also Another Story‎, same author, same "series" of NN blatant advertising - superβεεcat  04:59, 10 February 2008 (UTC)

• Delete both as nn. No WP:RS so fails WP:V policy. Sting au Buzz Me... 13:39, 9 February 2008 (UTC)
• Speedy Delete both unremarkable company, and blatant advertising. Obvious COI/Advertising, as there are 0 ghits other than homepage. - superβεεcat  18:57, 9 February 2008 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.