Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goldlined Success

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Sjakkalle (Check!) 09:27, 20 July 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Goldlined Success

Delete - It's actually nonsense but might not have qualified at first glance. Even if you don't deem it nonsense: nn band vanity, no Allmusic page, no notability established, 8 google hits. All in all something that should be deleted. TheMidnighters 06:59, 10 July 2005 (UTC)

• Delete, band vanity. --Angr/_{tɔk tə mi} 08:29, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete band vanity. It's funny, you would expect that the "the greatest band to ever grace the airwaves" would have more than 4 google hits to their name. Leithp 09:01, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
• 'Delete typical vanity and nn. Plus they just had to use a peacock term, and, as Leithp said, they've only got 4 hits, so not much truth in their claim. Gone it is -mysekurity 17:19, 10 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete I listened to this band, they are not so great. Seriously, their last ten albums were mediocre and they are only milking the system now just because of their incredible ability to make marketable pop tunes. It's about time we dethrone Goldlined Success! Alex 20:01, July 10, 2005 (UTC)
• Delete nn band vanity, doubtful claims. --Etacar11 02:12, 11 July 2005 (UTC)
• Delete non notable band vanity. JamesBurns 08:21, 11 July 2005 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.