Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden birthday

This page is an archive of the proposed deletion of the article below. Further comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was Keep. No consensus on what to do with this article. --Tony Sidaway^Talk 10:25, 11 September 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Golden birthday

Neologism made up after someone asked about this subject on the reference desk. Hoaxy. Delete. Proto t c 14:02, 31 August 2005 (UTC)

• Strong Keep Merge into Birthday or Transwiki. This is certainly not a neologism. Real term and concept. Over 5000 Google hits. android79 12:10, September 1, 2005 (UTC)
• transwiki to Wiktionary, it's just a definition DV8 2XL 14:35, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Delete or move per DV8 2XL. SaltyPig 15:39, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with birthday or keep. Kappa 17:58, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Transwiki per DV8 2XL. Tonywalton  | Talk 18:36, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Keep - Rewrite to forward to wiktionary and move defenition there. --Quasipalm 20:40, 31 August 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with birthday. Definitely not a neologism, but also not worthy of an article. Beginning 21:32, August 31, 2005 (UTC)
• Merge with birthday per Beginning. Sjakkalle (Check!) 07:10, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Merge and transwiki. The content is apropriate as a line or two on the Birthday article and also apropriate on Wiktionary. Thryduulf 11:07, 1 September 2005 (UTC)
• Delete, or atleast merge with birthday. Dunc|☺

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.