Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golden Age of Knowledge

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Singularity 06:58, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Golden Age of Knowledge

Golden Age of Knowledge (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) (delete) – (View log)

At present, article is only sourced to self-referential primary sources affiliated with the Church of Scientology, the publisher of these works. I could not find significant discussion of the article's subject matter in secondary WP:RS/WP:V sources. I could not find any mention of "Golden Age of Knowledge" in any books or in a news archive search, or a search of scholarly works. In addition, zero hits came up in searches of InfoTrac. If this subject matter has been significantly discussed/analyzed in secondary WP:RS/WP:V sources to satisfy WP:NOTE - I have not been able to find any mention in searches of multiple different types of indices of secondary sources. Cirt (talk) 06:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

  • Redirect to Church of Scientology merchandising (or other link, see below). Without independent sources, there's no way we can write an article on this topic. With only primary sources the most we can do is add a mention on one of the Scientology pages covering the church's commercial operations. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 19:53, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Redirect Delete per Sheffi. It's not about a Golden Age of anything. It's about some merchandise for sale. Mandsford (talk) 21:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Comment: If there is nothing of value here and zero independent sources, then why redirect, instead of just Delete? Cirt (talk) 00:24, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Comment You got a point there. Why should "Golden Age of Knowledge" take a person to a scientology article? Mandsford (talk) 13:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Good point. Delete for lack of secondary sources, and merge a mention (if necessary) into an appropriate Scientology article. Sheffield Steeltalkstalk 13:18, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete as advertising unless reliable sources are provided. Terraxos (talk) 20:08, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
  • Delete Currently none of the good stuff about this event and program are RS usable on Wikipedia. AndroidCat (talk) 21:10, 8 April 2008 (UTC)


The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.