Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold Group

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete. Nishkid64 01:40, 30 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gold Group

Gold Group (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) - (View log)

Doesn't seem notable as defined at WP:CORP. May simply be an advertisement for the company. zadignose 12:11, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

• delete as possible advert for NN-company Cornell Rockey 21:47, 17 January 2007 (UTC)

This doesnt seem like an advertisment. It is a descriptive bio of a company. It would seem interesting that people with their own descriptive bios posted on wikipedia would call this page out. (Saramcgo 16:21, 22 January 2007 (UTC))

"Descriptive" in a POV way, describing a non-notable company with no citations. The linked article about an OXFAM auction of a Keira Knightly dress doesn't even mention Gold Group, not that it would be sufficiently notable had they been mentioned. And I'm not sure to whom you refer when you talk about "people with their own descriptive bios posted on wikipedia." I have no such thing, and the only thing I can find on Cornell Rockey is a User Page, outside of the "main" namespace, completely appropriate and non-contestable... and he didn't "call this page out." I did. He merely voted as a disinterested party. I should hope more people would do so, but few really seem to care about this non-notable entity.zadignose 17:00, 22 January 2007 (UTC)

Kelly Services this might help some of you...came across it earlier (Saramcgo 21:31, 23 January 2007 (UTC))

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached
 Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, ST47Talk 11:53, 25 January 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: as not enough goings on mentioned to be convincing. Auction event may be notable though, if it was the first such event and set a trend - though I'd need to see some evidence of this. Stephen B Streater 20:14, 25 January 2007 (UTC)
• Delete This firm may eventually become notable. But one auction doesn't cut it right now. One of the sources doesn't even mention the company, they just talk about the dress.Montco 03:19, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

This is presumably because the Gold Group's one claim to fame was not even that they auctioned a dress, but that they worked with Oxfam (in some largely unspecified way, something to do with "social media") to promote the auction of the dress. zadignose 05:07, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.