Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gold-Lined Success

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result of the debate was delete. Mailer Diablo 05:23, 7 February 2006 (UTC)

[edit] Gold-Lined Success

Does not mention a record deal of anything of note. Another vanity band page. Banana04131 04:37, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

Nominated for Speedy on second thought. Hope it pases. Banana04131 04:41, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

While it is vanity, WP:MUSIC states:

The fact an article doesn't meet guidelines on this page, does not necessarily mean it qualifies for speedy deletion, as a mere claim of notability (even if contested) may avoid deletion under A7.

Ergo, this article cannot be speedied. It still should be deleted, though. Royboycrashfan 06:46, 1 February 2006 (UTC)

• "a somewhat popular band" is a claim of notability?! Sheesh. Delete. User:Zoe|^(talk) 21:27, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Gold lined delete as failing to establish any claim to notability. Just zis  Guy, you know? ^[T]/_[C] 21:57, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete. Lack of success. RasputinAXP _{talk contribs} 23:55, 1 February 2006 (UTC)
• Delete non-notable band. —Brim 05:40, 2 February 2006 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.