Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Goguryeo-Guk

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep Whether or not this needs moving, redirecting or merging is an editing decision that doesn't need AFD to decide. Spartaz Humbug! 23:11, 12 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Goguryeo-Guk

Goguryeo-Guk (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Possible hoax. See discussion at WP:VP/A#What happens now? and talk page. Note: I know nothing about this topic - I'm listing it for another user. At very best, it is an unreferenced article. x42bn6 Talk Mess 14:03, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

It's not a hoax. It's obscure, but it should have its own page and be expanded. See http://www.google.com/search?q=%EA%B2%80%EB%AA%A8%EC%9E%A0+%EA%B3%A0%EA%B5%AC%EB%A0%A4%EA%B5%AD&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.6.247.237 (talk) 15:35, 26 November 2007 (UTC)

  • An article is warranted; the one currently there needs considerable clean-up and sourcing - and perhaps even renaming. The best brief English account that google brings up (on terms like "Goguryeo restoration" and "Koguryo resistance" rather than "Goguryeo-Guk") is this (scroll down to "Anseung" or "670") --Paularblaster (talk) 16:12, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep not a hoax, so listing reasoning is false. Needs cleanup. Isn't WikiProject Korea already working on this article? It should be renamed to Bodeok, as the more common name. 132.205.99.122 (talk) 20:19, 26 November 2007 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, User:Ceyockey (talk to me) 12:43, 4 December 2007 (UTC)
  • Keep as clearly not a hoax. Any content problems or possible renaming should be dealt with by the usual editing process and discussion on the article's talk page. Phil Bridger (talk) 12:25, 5 December 2007 (UTC)
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.