Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gogoddess

The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. - Mailer Diablo 02:44, 29 August 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Gogoddess

Gogoddess (edit|talk|history|links|watch|logs) – (View log)

Was listed as CSD A7. I think it is better reviewed here. I see no WP:RS and nothing to provide WP:V of notability. JodyB _{yak, yak, yak} 22:19, 24 August 2007 (UTC)

• Delete: This reads like an advertisement. It is originally researched and has no sources against which to verify. -- VegitaU 23:58, 24 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete per nom. Kappa 06:10, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete: I agree - reads like an ad. I was the one who nominated for a speedy delete. I know formatting isn't a reason to delete a page, but the fact that the page repeats itself and hasn't been fixed looks like this was someone posting the page and running. Smashville 16:39, 25 August 2007 (UTC)
• Delete. Just another advertisement for a non-notable web site. Googling yielded nothing that would resemble a reliable source. -FisherQueen (Talk) 01:33, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.